![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib4NMOFxfgP974e1X7QU4R5nkG8MAy_psfIZo-A4ZKy_KfYpsRrbHPDQmxq8QAXQBqLzLHVQAQXobyZ-rZ3Xv2AXsp7ow42TNAxMqJElbPA5YoIEj5ElSHMwAAGiA4sKni1x0CYqqYtEU/s200/escita.png)
Interestingly, the court's decision contains many references in the decision to the 4 May 2007 decision of Mr Justice Kitchin, with which decision the Dutch Court on relevant points “respectfully disagrees” (as the court said, in English, at § 6.39), on the basis of different/further evidence to that put before Kitchin J. You can read the court's decision in full here -- in Dutch.
[Information supplied by Richard Ebbink and Mark van Gardingen, Brinkhof].
No comments:
Post a Comment