data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ede/33edeaad06d9dcc79b3ae079cdebd4ed8bc582c7" alt=""
On SPCs, the FSC held that a marketing authorisation for a racemic product does not prevent the grant of a supplementary protection certificate to an enantiomer form of the product based on a later marketing authorisation to the enantiomer of the product and a patent on that enantiomer.
You might recall that this case has also been heard and decided in the Netherlands (here in Dutch, and here for an English translation) and the UK (here).
No comments:
Post a Comment