tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6377401824680246858.post3626556548784417376..comments2024-03-05T15:49:16.751+00:00Comments on The SPC blog: Fordham Report 2014: SPCsroberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03575489215896576032noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6377401824680246858.post-19173986954092320752014-12-15T15:40:51.345+00:002014-12-15T15:40:51.345+00:00The term evergreening was used by Mr Justice Birss...The term evergreening was used by Mr Justice Birss in the recent case Hospira v Genentech (see para 7 of http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2014/3857.html)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6377401824680246858.post-54819998482471306032014-05-10T13:13:24.716+01:002014-05-10T13:13:24.716+01:00Interesting point: nobody is proposing or formulat...Interesting point: nobody is proposing or formulating any test that could satisfy everybody, neither the Commission/ECJ, nor the national courts and the labs. LJ Arnold has tried, but his core invention's test has been rejected by most of the parties/governments involved in Eli Lilly. And the authors of this article seem themselves to have no better solution/interpretation to propose, and just express their dissatisfaction :) But at least it is to be expected that Actavis, Eli Lilly and Georgetown have been satisfied with the answers of the ECJ in their cases since it is expected they gonna win their cases...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com